From the comment section of this article:
On Tape: Burlington Police Chief Lied Repeatedly About Twitter Account in July CallPosted By Courtney Lamdin on Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 9:56 PM
On Tape: Burlington Police Chief Lied Repeatedly About Twitter Account in July CallPosted By Courtney Lamdin on Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 9:56 PM
The
outrageousness of this cannot be overstated. The Vermont Supreme Court
has repeatedly ruled that any employee dishonesty is just cause for
immediate termination even in cases of minor misrepresentations. Here
the dishonesty is fourfold, ongoing, and profound:
1) The Chief twitter-bullied Mr. Winkleman without revealing his true identity.
2) The Chief's repeated and purposeful lies in the SevenDays interview of July 23rd.
3) The coverup by the Chief and the Mayor to the public, the City Council, and the Police Commission of the real context of his "leave of absence" until it was outed 5 months later by WCAX TV News. This was misrepresentation by omission, not "self-reporting."
4) The misrepresentation by omission by the Mayor and the Chief by failing to disclose that the Chief had been relieved of his gun and his badge.
Posted by
John Franco
on 12/14/2019 at 7:55 AM
1) The Chief twitter-bullied Mr. Winkleman without revealing his true identity.
2) The Chief's repeated and purposeful lies in the SevenDays interview of July 23rd.
3) The coverup by the Chief and the Mayor to the public, the City Council, and the Police Commission of the real context of his "leave of absence" until it was outed 5 months later by WCAX TV News. This was misrepresentation by omission, not "self-reporting."
4) The misrepresentation by omission by the Mayor and the Chief by failing to disclose that the Chief had been relieved of his gun and his badge.
No comments:
Post a Comment